(Modern Medieval is pleased to host this guest post by Prof. Rabia Gregory, University of Missouri-Columbia)
Last month, as French ground forces moved into Mali at the
request of Mali’s interim President, horrified whispers spread across the
internet: Timbuktu’s manuscripts were in peril. On January 28, the French army
moved to recapture Timbuktu amidst rumors that a retreating militia, perhaps
the Salafist group Ansar Deine, had torched the Ahmad Baba Library. Later
reports revealed that Ansar Deine had protected the Ahmad Baba Library, that the majority of manuscripts had been kept safe by African curators and local citizens,
and that rumors of fire were stoked by a Sky News reporter embedded with the French army and confirmed by Hallè Ousmane, Timbuktu’s mayor, exiled 800 km
away in Bamako. As
images of scorched manuscripts on the tiled floors of the Ahmad Baba library
began circulating, medievalists voiced a visceral outrage: to us, more than
anyone, the destruction of books is an unfathomable act of barbarism. When
fighting in Aleppo set the medieval souks aflame, threatened the Crac des
Chevaliers, and endangered Palmyra and Old Damascus, and imperiled the
manuscripts of Timbuktu, my friends and colleagues turned to Facebook and blogs
to lament that they could never understand how anyone could so callously
destroy their own cultural heritage. As if destroying manuscripts marked humans
as dangerously different, or subhuman. As if our own armies had not destroyed vast collections of unique manuscript in Hamburg, Dresden, Baghdad, Mosul, Sarajevo, and elsewhere. As if we had forgotten how poor planning, corruption, war, and
disaffected citizens had doomed many of
“our” libraries—the 2009 collapse in Cologne, the 1870 bombardment and fire which destroyed Strasbourg’s library and museum, the wholesale destruction and
appropriation of books across Europe between 1914 and 1945, the floods which have permanently closed 12 libraries in Louisiana, damaged collections in Iowa, and endangered archives across the Eastern Seaboard. Arson has destroyed
more books in the US and UK than in Africa: in 1986, an arsonist destroyed over 400,000 books and manuscripts in the Los Angeles County Library, and the sole surviving copy of the Beowulf manuscript, (BL Cotton
Vitellius A. xv.) was damaged by fire in 1731; other unique manuscript copies,including the Life of Alfred, did not survive. Last year, a disgruntled alumnus vandalized and attempted to burn down
our main research library last year sprinklers saved the building but water and smoke damaged many books and some of the Missouri State Historical Society’s collection. Though we now find it quaint and amusing, the
Bodleian’s famous oath recognizes the threat fire poses to libraries.
Western-educated
medievalists are complicit in the ongoing destruction to medieval culture in
Africa and the Near East, just as we passively allow the defunding and
desecration of medieval archives and medieval studies programs in Europe and
the Americas. There can be no apology for criminal actions under the guise of war, no excuses for the weak corrupt governments which cling to power
exploiting the citizens of Africa and the Near East. But, as a medievalist who
works with German manuscripts, and an Arab-American who follows the news from
the Middle East closely, I must point out that many of the worst losses of
medieval books and buildings have occurred in Western Europe. As we sit in our
offices accusing them of barbarism, many Arabs and Muslims are mobilizing to
protect medieval artifacts and memorializing ongoing tragedies through medieval
poetry. The destruction of books, by fire or war, should not be an
incomprehensible “act of barbarism” to medievalists, who habitually nuance the “barbaric” and often find our
own western manuscripts have been lost to war or fire. My own research is
hampered by the losses at libraries in Lübeck, Wroclaw, Dresden, and Strasbourg. Only a small portion of
the 100 boxes of medieval manuscripts relocated by the Wroclaw City Library in
1943 under threat of bombardment have been recovered; those lost to fire will never
resurface. I expect simplistic narrative of savage Muslim destroying priceless
antiquities in incomprehensible acts of barbarism from reporters compiling
stories from wire reports. Medievalists, many of whom are widely read in
postcolonial theory, and invested in recovering evidence of marginal peoples,
should know better.
Showing posts with label Modern Medieval. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Modern Medieval. Show all posts
Sunday, February 10, 2013
Monday, November 5, 2012
Revisiting the "Judeo-Christian" Tradition
Just to toot my own horn for a moment, I have just co-edited a special issue of the journal Relegere: Studies in Religion and Reception, 2:2 (2012) entitled "Revisiting the 'Judeo-Christian' Tradition." Some really wonderful essays there (and my mediocre one), especially in that many of them try (successfully, I think) to bridge chronological gaps and move between ancient/ medieval and modern.
Check it out at http://relegere.org/index.php/relegere/issue/view/32.
Check it out at http://relegere.org/index.php/relegere/issue/view/32.
Labels:
Christians,
Jews,
Journals,
Medieval,
Modern Medieval,
Online,
Open Access,
Publishing
Wednesday, February 22, 2012
A New Hope
Hello. Remember me? It's been a while...For various reasons, mostly delineated here, things have been quite silent here. The blog has therefore fallen into a sort of disrepair, tumbleweeds flying about, sand people getting more courageous, the empire ascendant, etc.
Anyway, it's time to strike back from our desert hideout.
This blog is back.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)