It’s a little more than a week after NCS Portland, and I’m
still a bit exhausted. It was an
exhilarating, packed time. (You can read
my paper here in a previous post.) I also made the 5 day drive from New Orleans to Portland. Since I use a power wheelchair, I tend to
avoid flying when possible. But this
trip pushed to the limits my resolve to eschew flying for driving. On the plus
side, I saw a lot of the country, and my wife and I drove through The Columbia
River Gorge on the way into Portland. If
you haven’t seen it, it’s nothing short of breath-taking. We drove alongside the river, which was nestled
between mountains. On the way back, we
wanted to drive over the river to add Washington to our “states-we’ve-been-to”
list, and the bridge was named The Bridge of the Gods. The view was spectacular, and really, is
there a cooler name for a bridge?
 |
| The Island of the Dead in The Columbia River Gorge |
Portland itself is a wonderful city. I especially loved how much of a pedestrian
city it is—it’s been a while since I’ve traversed a city that much in my
wheelchair. And, as everyone knows, the beer is excellent, and they have Voodoo
Donuts, which serves bacon donuts with a maple glaze. Homer Simpson’s drooling “sacralicious” comes
to mind. I could easily turn this into a food post, so I better move on to the
thing itself: the Congress.
 |
| Portland, an excellent city with lots of green and public spaces. |
This was my first NCS (more or less—long story), though I’ve
long heard that it’s one of the better conferences for medieval studies. Everyone was right: it was excellent. I was
also particularly pleased to be there since David Lawton is the out-going
Executive Director, and I was happy to be able to join in the numerous bouts of
applause and public thanks for his tireless work for the society. I am a bit
biased here since David was my doctoral adviser, but I know first-hand how deeply
committed he is to making the event dynamic and vibrant. His vision of medieval studies, often reflected
in his work for NCS, is future-oriented.
We maintain the health of the field by being generous and welcoming (he
is especially passionate about the importance of increased grad student
participation) and by putting medieval lit into dialogue with other
literatures and other intellectual conversations. NCS 2012 demonstrated all of this brilliantly. This is the medieval studies I signed up for.
Unlike a conference like Kalamazoo (this is not at all a
negative comparison, just a distinction), NCS has several threads with multiple
sessions attached to them. For example, there were threads on the Neighbor, Ecologies,
Oceans, the Book, Affect, and a few others.
Theoretically this could create a compartmentalizing sense of there
being isolated mini-conferences, but I found just the opposite. My paper was on
one of the Neighbor panels, and so I did go to several sessions on this thread,
which felt like being part of a continuing, unfolding conversation. There were
too many other excellent sessions to ignore, though, so I went to sessions on
the human and the non-human, nature into culture, animate objects, and an
excellent combination of two threads: oceans/neighbors (more on that in a
moment).
My panel was on the Neighbor and the Romance/Stranger. It was excellent to meet my fellow
presenters: Mark Bruce, Emily Houlik-Richey, and George Shuffleton. Our session had a large amount of agreement,
which was surprising since we hadn’t discussed our work with each other
previously. We did, of course, have some
differences in how we viewed the romance, that most slippery of genres. Perhaps
because of the shared sympathies in the panel, the Q&A was mostly directed
to the panel as a whole, and less so individual presenters. I found this challenging in the best way
since it allowed the four of us to think through the implications of the theory
of the Neighbor for a study of medieval lit. The other Neighbor panels pushed
our conversations forward immensely, but I was particularly impressed with the
Oceans/Neighbors panel. The program
committee (they all deserve a lot of thanks for their work overall) consciously
decided to hold some sessions that would consider the intersection of varying
threads. In this panel, the presenters
considered how bodies of water—ports, rivers, oceans—facilitate and structure
neighborly relations. A few of the
papers also reflected on how changed we are by passing through or over bodies
of water. George Edmondson gave an excellent talk on the sea as a state of
nature qua state of exception, and Candace Barrington considered the changes
Chaucer underwent as his work went transatlantic (her paper also validated my
fondness of the movie A Knight’s Tale as
a guilty pleasure). I wish I could comment on all the other excellent papers I
heard, but there’s only so much time.
I do want to say a few words about the plenaries,
though. I’ve been an admirer of Anne
Middleton since my first seminar on Piers
Plowman, and it was great to hear her lecture on “Loose Talk.” But Carolyn
Dinshaw’s plenary on “All Kinds of Time” was, perhaps, the highlight for me in
terms of congress events. Insightful,
provocative, and just damn funny, her talk started with Portlandia, where the Dream of the 90’s is Alive, and went through Mandeville
and 19th century parodists of him, and ended with Brantley Bryant’s
Chaucer blog. Her talk was an eloquent reminder that we all experience the
world polychronically. Going to Portland can feel like time-travel just as much
as reading Chaucer can. We don’t live life as a series of discrete now-moments,
identical with themselves, but rather we inhabit and are surrounded by a multiplicity
of temporalities. We read the past through the present, and vice versa. We cannot keep strict boundaries between
medieval studies (the study of the past itself) and medievalism (the creation
and/or re-writing of that past). Keeping them walled off from each other will
only isolate our field further. This is
not to say that A Game of Thrones is
interchangeable with medieval romance, but the connections can be vibrant, for
us and for our students. Especially for our students.
Dinshaw’s talk has framed much of the way I remember the
Congress, a reminder that the encounter with multiple and multiplying
temporalities is a wonderful one. We all traveled, for example, varying lengths
of time to a place like Portland, which has its own particular temporalities,
both sincere and parodic. And more, we
all carry various times with us. I met many
colleagues like myself, that is, finished with the PhD but not yet fully
established, as well as those further along in their career or just getting
going. When we go to such a big event
like this, we get to share time with each other, at least for a little while. We
overlap and cut across each others’ times, and I think we’re the better for
it. While the talks and sessions and
plenaries were exciting and stimulating, it’s the chance conversations during
the receptions and interstitial moments I’ll remember the most. Whether it’s
sitting down for a beer in the hotel lobby with a fellow post-doc only to have
medievalists that have shaped my own work join us for a drink, or a certain
blogger, not to be named, shout “Winter is Coming” at me as I was about to go
give my paper.
NCS 2012, Portland was an engaging time, where I heard many,
many excellent talks, and where I met several people I previously knew only
from their published writings or from Facebook/Twitter. Warren Ginsburg and the local committee also deserve so much thanks for being such excellent hosts.
I may have to re-think my no-fly rule and go
to NCS Iceland in 2014.
No comments:
Post a Comment